International Panel
The International
panel
Eng Guido Benevento,
Italian Cooperation
Now I will open the
international panel, and in this panel we have various speakers: Mr
Paolo Vitali, from Giordano Dell’Amore Foundation, which
is particularly involved in microcredit and microfinance, Mr Antonio
Loche, who is the Secretary General of the Italian National Committee
for 2005 International Year of Microcredit, Mr Ahmed El Ashmawi
of Sanabel, which is a network Organization dealing with
Microcredit and Microfinance in the Arab region, and finally we have
professor Marcella Corsi, from Fondazione Risorsa Donna, Italy.
Mr Paolo
Vitali, Giordano Dell’Amore Foundation, Italy
Thank you. I will
present you an overview of the International Year of Microcredit 2005.
This initiative launched by the United Nations comes from the vision of
scaling up efforts in building up entrepreneurial skills to meet the
demand for microfinance.
As we heard from the
UN representative in Egypt, Mr Vigilante, the percentage of the people
who receive a supply of financial services from formal financial
communities is still very low, and the gap with people who do not
receive this supply is still great. This could mean that the portion of
clients who have access to loans is growing at a 25% rate per year, and
to reach our goals we need to increase the amount of access to financial
services for these people, and to establish more potential means to use
microfinance in a more effective way so to alleviate poverty.
By 2015, at least 50%
of households and microenterprises should have access to quality
financial services. And then, what are the objectives for these
initiatives? We have five specific ones, which aim at achieving the
Millennium Development Goals MDGs):
1.
Assess and promote the contribution of microfinance and
microcredit to the MDGs;
2.
Increase public awareness and understanding of
microfinance and microcredit as vital parts of the development equation;
3.
Promote inclusive financial sectors;
4.
Support sustainable access to financial services, and
5.
Encourage innovation and new partnerships by promoting
and supporting strategic partnerships to build and expand the success of
microcredit and microfinance.
Of course, for the
actions to be effective, many actors have to be seriously committed.
Between them:
1. The
Governments:
their
legal, fiscal and regulatory systems should encourage rather than block
microfinance
2. The Donors
community: microfinance should be treated as a critical part of the
financial sector not as a part of development projects.
3. NGOs: they
should provide financial services to poor people primarily as a business
concern, not a charitable act.
Because of all the
activities planned during the whole Year (Blue
Book Project, Data Project, Global Microentrepreneurship Awards, Shop
Micro, The year of microcredit web site, Microfinance Matters
(newsletter), Public Service Announcements & other special Events), what
is expected to happen after 2005 is:
-
Considerable
follow-up at all levels after the close of the Year will help sustain
the momentum achieved by the Year observance;
-
The 60th General
Assembly will present a general strategy to maintain the momentum
created by the Year following its close;
-
The Year website
will continue in a format to be determined after the close of the
observance;
-
Many initiatives
inspired by the Year will continue their effort to build sustainable and
inclusive financial sectors and achieve the MDG.
Everyone can
participate in the activities planned to celebrate the Year: you can set
up and support your national committee, you can promote the importance
of quality financial services, build commitment in your own
organization, volunteer, promote and support capacity building programs
such as the Master on Microfinance, which is sponsored by Italian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, because we do trust that training and
capacity building is an essential component of microfinance.
Mr Ahmed El
Ashmawi, Executive Director, Sanabel
I would like to
present a survey the title of which is "Microfinance in Arab states"4,
the third in a series of publications which document the state of
microfinance in the Arab States’ Region and which track the development
of this young industry over time.
The survey attempts to
map out the major suppliers of microfinance in the region and to
highlight the challenges and opportunities available for developing
mature initiatives. The first two surveys were undertaken by the Private
Sector Development Group of the Middle East and North Africa Region of
the World Bank. The Sanabel Microfinance Network was the key force
behind the third survey, having decided to institutionalize the regular
update of MFI data as part of its core regional initiatives.
Sanabel,
the Microfinance Network of the Arab Countries, is a membership-driven
regional network for microfinance institutions in the Arab world. Today
the network has 27 institutional members. These 27 MFIs together are
estimated to serve 70% of the number of active borrowers in the region.
Sanabel was founded in September 2002 by 17 representatives from seven
countries (Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Occupied Palestinian
Territories, Tunisia, and Yemen). The founding members—14 institutions
and three individuals— formulated the by-laws and membership criteria,
the vision, and the mission and the objectives of the organization, and
elected an Executive Committee for the network. The start-up of Sanabel
and its initial operations have been supported by the Rockdale
Foundation.
In the spring of 2003,
Sanabel sent out a comprehensive 19-page questionnaire through its local
country representatives to all the known MFIs in the Arab States asking
for data on loan portfolios and key performance indicators by the end of
year 2002.
The questionnaire also
asked for information on governance, legal issues, management issues,
and products and services. The initial feedback was disappointing
because only a small minority of institutions responded to the
questionnaire. This was most likely caused by the fact that the
questionnaire was too long and very technical in nature. Furthermore,
Sanabel was still quite young and as such not fully established as a
representative network in the region. At the same time, the use of local
MFI focus points operating in the same sector may have made MFIs
reluctant to reply because of competitive issues.
Finally, the fact that
in some countries, such as Lebanon, many MFIs did not meet the Sanabel
eligibility criteria for becoming a member, heavily reduced MFI
receptivity of the initiative. However, afterwards time and effort were
dedicated to respondents and therefore a relatively complete and
reliable 2002 year dataset was established for 51 MFIs. A
mini-questionnaire covering year 2003 data (where available) was
collected during the Conference on Microfinance in the Arab World in
December 2003 and this helped fill up many gaps and provide further
basis for analysis.
In this context for
many years Egypt has been the leader of microfinance with a great number
of active clients in the region. However, in the previous survey, we saw
that the growth of the sector appeared to be very low at the beginning,
but then it followed a remarkable sprint after 2001. At the end of year
2003, Egypt had over 250,000 active clients, of whom more than 80% were
served by seven fully sustainable MFIs (out of the 20 included in the
2003 mini-survey). Over $55 million were distributed in microloans.
Egypt has also
increased women’s loans: while at the end of 1999 only 25% of the
clients were women, this proportion had increased to 35% by the end of
2002 and 46% by the end of year 2003. We will see below that this can be
attributed to the introduction of women group lending from the USAID-supported
Foundations, which together with the Banque du Caire and the National
Bank for Development dominate the market.
The remarkable growth
in Egypt can be attributed to two key factors: loan product
diversification with the introduction of group lending (for women
especially); and the revitalization of downscaling programs through
banks, notably through the Banque du Caire; both initiatives were
sponsored by the major donor in the sector, USAID. The microfinance
scheme in Egypt as well as in many countries in the region has been
characterized by a general lack of product diversification. This has
occurred up to very recently that is till when USAID began putting a
renewed emphasis on its poverty lending projects, by defining the
quantity of each money loan at around less than $300.
In an effort to reach
more poor people and improve its gender balance, EQI—
Environmental Quality International, USAID’s Technical Assistance
Provider in Egypt—designed and implemented a new group-lending product
for women in all seven of USAID’s partner Foundations. Before this, the
Foundations had focused only on individual loans from which women were
not excluded, even though the majority of borrowers were men.
Prof. Marcella Corsi, Fondazione
Risorsa Donna, Rome, Italy
Just very briefly I
would like to explain who we are: we are a Foundation that mainly deals
with gender and microcredit and is a member of the Italian National
Committee for 2005 International Year of Microcredit.
Even if we are born
quite recently from the Italian experience of the Women World Banking,
we are already experiencing good results on women empowerment through
microcredit: in Italy, for example, we work a lot with immigrants who
are willing to start up new income generating activities.
Today I am going to
introduce our project, Women and Microfinance, a new path for
development in Mediterranean countries, a research that will be
presented in Italy in September, which is absolutely coherent with what
we are discussing today. The information about the program itself can be
required to our institution and I will be glad to be contacted later to
give more details on our work.
This kind of activity
is focused on the growing empirical evidence about the return on loans
of the female participation. There are not only a lot of good practices
but also a lot of literature on this topic and when we look at it what
comes out is that the impact of microfinance interventions on women
might have some controversial but relevant results: that is, some
studies have confirmed that the economic and social empowerment that
microfinance programs have on female participants might be very
effective as far as I could see from the work which has been done so far
within PAP. Some remarkable results have come out from the experience
carried out in Egypt. And I am really glad to say that, with this
opportunity we have actually established contacts and collaboration with
the staff of PAP and the Italian Cooperation in Egypt, and we intend to
go on in this direction.
Other studies, on the
other hand, also affirm that the relation between women’s access to
loans and women’s empowerment is not that strong: this is why we are
collecting information, through a questionnaire, on how microcredit
programs affected women’s lives in the Mediterranean area. For this
reason we have contacted Sanabel, a network of MFIs that will support us
in broadening our own network, and tried to put into contact MFIs from
Middle East with those which operate in Kosovo, Montenegro, Bosnia and
Croatia.
Finally, last but not
least, we are presently concentrating on the microcredit experiences in
our countries, in Italy, first of all, because we are, as I said, an
Italian microcredit institution.
_____
4. Brandsma, Burjorjee
, ibidem
|